Since I started eleven rounds ago I have predicted 53 out of
110 games correctly for 83 points.
Lawrenson predicted 54 games correctly for 70 points. Merson predicted
52 games correctly for 70 points.
I will link to Lawrenson’s and Merson’s new predictions when
they are published. They will be found
here and here.
Here are my predictions using the same rules outlined
here.
Hull-Newcastle 1-2
Palace-Everton 1-1
Liverpool-West Ham 1-1
Man U-Leicester 1-0
Stoke-QPR 2-1
Sunderland-Burnley 2-1
West Brom-Spurs 1-2
Chelsea-Man City 2-1
Arsenal-Aston Villa 1-0
Southampton-Swansea 1-0
I have been thinking about an inconsistency in my
system. Roughly, one in three games ends
in a draw and one in three games is decided by two or more goals. Yet, I am willing to predict draws, but not
two goal victories. I did not think
about this when I created the system, but I am satisfied with the discrepancy.
If you are trying to get the result (but not the score) right, you
need draws because they count as a different result. You do not need two goal victories because they
are the same result as a one goal victory.
When you are trying to get the score right, draws do not
hurt your chances very much. Realistically
speaking you are only going to pick 0-0, 1-1, or 2-2 draws and 1-1 draws seem
to be the most common. A 1-1 draw is,
therefore, a result that is likely to occur.
Similarly, 1-0 and 2-1 victories are very common
results. 3-2 victories are much less
common, so there is no reason to pick them.
On the other hand, once you decided to try to predict victories by two
or more goals, you have opened many more possibilities: 2-0, 3-1, 4-2, 3-0,
4-1, 5-2, 4-0, etc. Even if you are
right about the team that is going to win and by how much, you are still very
likely to get the exact score wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment