I
watched the Youtube video of Garry Monk’s press conference this week. He spoke about Southampton and his time here. I transcribed the Southampton relevant parts
of the video. As always, I removed the
false starts and verbal ticks. This
press conference was certainly more interesting than the Alan Pardew press
conference of last week. Monk was quite
a bit more relaxed. Maybe he thinks his
job is safe.
Q: And I was going to say a different story now
with Southampton--well you are at home so that makes it different from the
start. At the beginning of the season
people were saying they sold 70 odd percent of their goals from last season
during the summer and being a club the size of Southampton could they ever
recover from that? Does it look as if
they have recovered from it?
Monk: I think so.
Selling all those players for a lot of money they have also used that
money to buy in very quality players as well and at this moment in time they
are playing very well especially their last two games where they performed
extremely high level and scoring goals last week especially against
Newcastle. I thought they played some
fantastic football...some very good goals... and they have threats, they have
threats everywhere. It's never easy when
you lose players that have done very well for you in the past but it's
important that you replace them with as good a quality as what you lost and I
think Southampton have done that.
Q: You think they
have replaced ...
Monk: Yeah. I think so. I think it shows in the way
they are playing. Obviously the new
players who have come in have scored goals so obviously--like you talked
about--if they have lost goals then
people who have come in can score goals that obviously what they are doing this
moment in time.
Q: Rather like Swansea they play to a
style. Has that style changed
dramatically this season?
Monk: I think there has been tweaks to it to what
they were doing before under Pochettino but very similar to ourselves in the
way they set up and how they go about their jobs. We see their wingers are a little bit more
inside than ours and float about a little bit more. But no, I think the mentality of the group
seems to be the same in the way they go about their business and the football
they are playing is pretty similar but obviously with the tweaks the new
manager has put in place.
Q: Do you still look for Southampton's results?
Monk: Yeah. Of
course. Probably even more so now that
they are in our league, but, obviously, my focus is Swansea but my time at
Southampton was brilliant. I've talked
about it many times. As an education for
me as a young player coming through with the pros that I had there at the time
was probably one of the best I could have had and I have good affection. I have a lot of friends still down at
Southampton. Yeah, of course, I look for
their results.
Other subjects for a
while
Q: You talked about Southampton with Roger
there. Ronald Koeman has he impressed
you since he has come into the British game as a manager?
Monk: Yeah.
I said in the last few questions that Southampton have started very well in the season. Obviously, a place behind us...performing
very well especially their last two games playing some good football and the
way that we looked to them and watched them in those games, it will be a very
difficult game for us. We will be under
no illusions how tough it’s going to be for us.
We had a disappointing performance at the end of last season here to
lose the game with a bit of a comedy goal so that will be something that we
look to put right but no I have to speak very highly of them. They have done very well.
Q: When you think back to your time as a player
at Southampton with experienced players like Matt Le Tissier and Francis Benali and guys like that did it
shape you as a manager and a person? Is
there a part of your time at Southampton that you really took with you to the
man you are today?
Monk: Definitely.
It definitely taught me a lot. I
had players there at that time where, you talked about Matt Le Tissier; and, we
had Jason Dodd who was the captain; Francis Benali; we had older pros like Dan Petrescu come in;
Kanchelskis came in at that time; Carlton Palmer; David Hirst; all these
experienced pros that had been around the game for so long and they were great
with me, great with the younger boys.
Obviously, I was in the first team environment at that point learning my
trade. Claus Lundekvam; Dean Richards at
the time; we had so many pros to learn off.
The thing was they were good pros.
They really took us under their wings and made it hard on us but they
were really fair and I learned so much.
If I look at three or four of them at that time they were at the club
for over ten years. They were coming up
to their testimonial years at the time in the years that I was there. It is funny how it works out that I ended up
going that long here. Whether that had
an effect I don't know really but I definitely learned loyalty and dedication
from them guys because that's what they preached every day. You'd see it in training even if they weren't
playing. Even as they got on towards the
end of their careers and they weren't playing week in and week out their
dedication to their trade and their club was amazing so in my mind I probably
took it on board.
Q: Was Mark Hughes there at that time?
Monk: Yes, Mark Hughes as well. Had some great pros, unbelievable pros when
you really look back and think about it and you go through the list. They were really good.
TRANSFERS
Swansea
had as busy a transfer season as we did, but on a much lower scale
financially. Of course, had we tried to
buy Gylfi Sigurdsson, we would have been charged a lot more money.
As
always, I evaluated the transfers using information from Football Manager (FM)
2014 and Transfermarkt.
CA stands for current ability in FM. PA stands for potential ability. Both are on a scale of 0 to 200. Negative PA scores reflect a young player’s
potential with -10 being the best and very rare. I ignored players who were loaned in both
this year and last, loaned out during both years, or loaned in last year and
bought this year when evaluating transfer business.
INCOMING
TRANSFERS
Player CA PA Transfer Fee (in
millions of pounds)
Bafetimbi
Gomis 144 145 free
Gylfi
Sigurdsson 142 165 8.89
Lukasz
Fabianski 138 148 free
Federico
Fernandez 135 152 8.8
Jefferson
Montero 134 150 4.4
Tom
Carroll 128 157 loan
Stephen
Kingsley 88 -6 undisclosed
Modou
Barrow 85 -6 undisclosed
James
Demetriou 56 -6 free
OUTGOING
TRANSFERS
Michu 150 160 loan (1.1 fee)
Michael
Vorm 148 152 5.01
Chico
Flores 137 156 4.4
Pablo
Hernandez 137 156 4.4
Jonathan
de Guzman 135 155 end
of loan
Roland
Lamah 134 145 end of loan
Alvaro Vasquez 132 155 end
of loan
Jose
Alberto Canas 130 140 free
David N’Gog 127 140 free
Ben
Davies 126 159 11.13
Leroy
Lita 121 126 free
Alejandro
Pozuelo 120 -8 free
Gwion
Edwards 90 -7 undisclosed
Jernade
Meade 80 -6 free
Kris
Scott 51 -5 free
Overall
the transfer window looks like a net negative for Swansea—at least according to
FM 2014. However, the biggest negative
was the loss of Michu who did not play much last year. If you take that transfer out of the
equation, it looks like there was not much of a change in squad quality. However, the loss of their top notch young
fullback, Ben Davies, seems familiar.
Even worse, they lost him to Tottenham.
Transfermarket
values Swansea’s entire roster at 87.78 million pounds which is 14th
in the BPL. We are 8th at
129.14 million pounds. To the extent this accurately reflects reality, it
suggests that we are a stronger and deeper team.
SWANSEA
STARTING ELEVEN
Last
year’s starting eleven is based on the players who got the most playing
time. This year’s is based on the best
CA’s at each position—more or less—except I am treating Shelvey as the starter.
Position
Last
year(CA) This year(CA)
G Vorm
148 Fabrianski
138
LB Ben
Davies 126 Taylor 135
CB Williams
145 145
CB Flores
137 Amat 135
RB Rangel
135 135
CM de
Guzman135 Ki 139
CM Shelvey
126 126
AM Routledge
135 135
AM Hernandez
137 Sigurdsson 142
AM Dyer
139 139
ST Bony
147 147
Swansea
has lost 12 points of CA at two positions and picked up 18 points at three positions
for a total gain of six points. This
means that their FM based first team strength is 1516 whereas ours is 1545.
INJURY
LIST AND THIS WEEK’S LINEUP
This is
the injury list from the BPL website:
Southampton: Rodriguez, Isgrove,
Gallagher, Mane (but I don’t think he is injured—just unavailable)
Swansea: Jordi Amat, Alan Tate, Leon Britton, Rory
Donnelly
STARTING
LINEUP
For Swansea’s
stating line up, I took last week’s line up and replaced the one newly injured
player with the consensus replacement.
For us, I took my best guess based upon who we played last week.
SWANSEA SOUTHAMPTON
POS PLAYER POS PLAYER
G Fabrianski 138 G Forster 138
LB Taylor 135 LB Bertrand 140
CB Williams 145 CB Alderweireld 140
CB Fernandez 135 CB Fonte 130
RB Rangel 135 RB Clyne 140
CM Ki 139 CM Cork 135
CM Shelvey 126 CM Schneiderlin 141
AM Routledge 135 CM Davis 135
AM Sigurdsson 142 LW Tadic 146
AM Dyer 139 ST Pelle 132
ST Bony 147 RW Long 142
Swansea’s
line up totals 1516 CA. Ours totals 1519
CA. Presumably this means that I should predict a draw on Saturday. The problem is that I know 130 underrates
Fonte, 140 underrates Clyne, 141 underrates Schneiderlin, and 132 underrates
Pelle. I suspect Forster and Cork are
underrated as well. Of course, Swansea
fans probably feel their players are underrated too, but I have only seen their
game against Chelsea so I can’t evaluate that.
On the
other hand, Swansea has earned nine points from teams that earned 18 points out
of 36 in their other games. We have
earned seven points from teams that have earned 10 out of 36 points in other
games. In other words, Swansea has played better that we have against opponents
that are playing better than our opponents.
And they beat West Brom. Our goal
differential is slightly better but it is too early to put much weight on that.
Since
there is no consequence for picking incorrectly and my preseason pick was for
Swansea to finish 14th, I was going to predict a Southampton
victory. But then I realized that I
picked Newcastle to finish 8th ahead of us at 9th. Good thing I ignored that last week. So I will reluctantly predict a draw.
No comments:
Post a Comment