Unfortunately, the project turned out to be far more time
consuming than I expected, although not more time consuming than I should have
expected. As a result, I have decided to
publish each part of the study as I finish it rather than waiting for the
entire study to be complete. It is
possible that I will lose interest or run out of time before I can finish
everything so it is better that something get published—if only to encourage me
to keep going.
A few caveats: my
results are based on the table position and statistics for each club after it
played exactly 19 games. In some years not
all clubs reached 19 games at the same time.
These totals apply to each club for their first 19 games of their
season—not for one game against each opponent.
For example, in 2010-2011, the first five clubs hit 19 games on December
27, but the other teams had only played 17 or 18 games. Manchester United played its 18th
game on December 29 and its 19th game on January 1. I counted both those games in my totals for
Manchester United, but not for its opponents if they had already played 19
games.
This chart summarizes where clubs stood in the table after
19 games with the points and goal differential it took to get there as well as where
the clubs ended the season and their points and goal differential at the end of
the season.
AFTER 19 GAMES FINAL
POSITION
Pos AvgPts PtsRng GDAvg GDRng AvgPos PosRng AvgPts PtsRng GDAvg GDRng
1 43.2 36-52 24.1 14-37 2.1 1-4 85.7 68-95 42.2 15-71
2 39.8 35-45 20.7 10-33 2.6 1-6 77.8 55-91 38.2 5-65
3 37.6 34-42 16.0 7-26 3.2 1-13 74.3 48-90 31.1 -12-44
4 34.3 30-37 12.1 1-21 4.7 2-8 66.4 53-77 20.1 -1-39
5 33.2 29-36 10.5 4-21 4.7 2-12 64.27 43-84 18.3 -15-51
6 31.6 28-34 9.7 -1-18 6.1 1-14 61.6 46-78 16.1 -6-37
7 29.7 26-34 3.3 -2-11 7.6 5-11 55.2 45-69 1.5 -11-26
8 27.8 24-33 0.7 -10-8 10.7 6-17 49.2 35-60 -5.0 -25-20
9 26.7 22-31 2.2 -5-10 10.2 6-16 49.8 39-61 -1.7 -23-23
10 25.2 24-28 -0.9 -6-2 10.9 6-16 49.1 37-63 -3.2 -20-28
11 24.1 21-27 -2.7 -11-3 10.5 6-19 49.7 39-61 -5.0 -20-26
12 22.9 21-25 -4.2 -11-1 11.3 4-18 47.9 34-68 -6.4 -25-21
13 22.3 20-25 -4.6 -15-4 11.8 6-20 45.9 33-58 -10.0 -34-5
14 21.3 18-25 -6.6 -16-1 14.4 7-19 41.8 30-54 -13.3 -40-6
15 19.9 17-22 -6.2 -16-8 13.4 9-17 44.3 36-52 -9.3 -24-9
16 18.6 17-21 -10.9 -23- - 15.5 8-20 40.2 25-52 -17.8 -42-2
17 17.7 15-20 -11.9 -20- - 15.7 8-19 39.6 32-50 -17.7 -35-6
18 16.5 14-20 -13.8 -22- -5 16.2 12-20 37.6 19-45 -21.9 -45- -1
19 15.0 10-18 -15.3 -26- -8 17.2 14-20 35.3 24-42 -23.7 -42-0
20 12.2 6-18 -20.6 -34- 19.2 14-20 28.4 11-42 -33.6 -69- -17
Pos: The clubs’ position
in the Table after 19 games
AvgPts: Average
number of points for clubs in this position after either 19 games or the full
season, depending.
PtsRng: The range of
points for clubs in this position after either 19 games or the full season,
depending.
GDAvg: The average goal differential for clubs in this
position after either 19 games or the full season, depending.
GDRng: The range of
goal differentials for clubs in this position after either 19 games or the full
season, depending.
AvgPos: The average
table position for clubs at the end of the season.
PosRng: The range of
table positions for clubs at the end of the season.
The most surprising (to me as a recent American fan of
English football) thing I discovered in doing this project was the second half
performance of the 2002-2003 Sunderland club.
I never would have guessed that a team that earned 18 points in their
first 19 games would only earn 1 point is their second 19 games. That must have been a miserable season. I assume it was also the type of historic
collapse that is still remembered and talked about.
At the halfway point of the season, the top of the table
holds good teams playing well and average teams playing very well. The bottom of the table contains bad teams
playing poorly and average team playing very poorly. The middle of the table contains average
teams playing averagely, good teams playing poorly, and poor teams playing well.
Perhaps this seems obviously, but it explains
why no team that finished the first nineteen games in 10th place or
better has ever been relegated and only one team has ever reached a Champions
League spot (as currently defined) if they were not in the top six after
nineteen games. (Leeds in 2001-2002: Fourth
place didn’t qualify them for a Champions League berth under the rules at that
time.) We will end the first half of the
season between 3rd and 6th place with 29, 30, or 32
points. That puts us in great shape to avoid relegation and gives us a shot at
the Champions League. No one really
could have hoped for more last summer.
Of course, we could let the “what ifs” run wild: we should have beaten Liverpool, Aston Villa,
Manchester United, West Brom, and Burnley.
We should have drawn with Arsenal and Tottenham. That is 15 points dropped. So we should be in second place with 44
points—already safe from relegation and virtually assured of a Champions League
spot. I suspect, however, that all our
rivals have their own “what ifs.”
It is worth noting that in terms of points earned Chelsea is
an above average 1st place team, even if we beat them Sunday. Manchester City is an above average 2nd
place team even if they lose Sunday. We, however, would be a below average 3rd,
4th, or 5th place team and just an average 6th
place team.
Our goal differential paints a more optimistic picture,
however. Unless, we get clobbered by
Chelsea, our goal differential will be well above average for whatever place we
end the half season at. The 19 game goal
differential figure seems to be a pretty good indicator of team quality. If you
look at the 8, 9, and 10 slots on the chart you can see that the otherwise
inexplicable poor performance by teams that finish 19 games in 8th
place appears to be explained by their poor goal differential both at 19 games
and over the whole season. Of course,
this is a fairly small sample size but I am convinced that goal differential is
as good a predictor of future performance as most anything else.
On the other end of the table, the chart shows just how
desperate Leicester is. Unless, they
beat Hull, they will be a below average 20th place team which is
further than average from safety. Even
if they beat Hull they are not in good shape.
That concludes the first part of my midseason statistical
over analysis. I hope you enjoyed it.
Edit: While working on the next phase of the project, I noticed 45 minor errors. I actually only made two minor errors but they infested about a quarter of the chart. None of them were significant and I have fixed them. Just to give one example, the goal difference average for 4th place after 19 games is 12.1 not 11.6 as originally posted. Sorry.
Edit: While working on the next phase of the project, I noticed 45 minor errors. I actually only made two minor errors but they infested about a quarter of the chart. None of them were significant and I have fixed them. Just to give one example, the goal difference average for 4th place after 19 games is 12.1 not 11.6 as originally posted. Sorry.
No comments:
Post a Comment