As an American who grew up playing very little
soccer and rarely watching football played at the highest level I never
developed the ability to judge football talent in the way that citizens of
virtually every other country in the world did.
I have spent the last four years watching BPL and Champions League
football on TV. I have averaged watching
about five games a week during that time.
I can understand and make judgments about what is happening on the field
far better today that I could four years ago, but I am hardly an expert,
especially when compared to the typical reader of this blog—the vast majority
of whom come from the UK. On the other
hand, I suspect that very few readers of this blog would be as qualified as I
to judge the ability of a left tackle in American football or the strike zone
judgment of a batter in baseball. And
yet I am hardly an expert at either task.
In 1978, my team, the San Francisco 49ers, was the
worst team in the NFL with a 2-14 record.
The team fired the general manager Joe Thomas and most of the coaching
staff and hired Bill Walsh who would eventually be voted into the Football Hall
of Fame as a coach. Yet, in 1979 the
49ers were, once again, the worst team in football with a 2-14 record. Had Walsh been a BPL manager he would have
been fired. Had the 49ers been a BPL
team, they would have been relegated.
However, any American football fan who watched the 1979 49ers could see
that they were a much improved team with much greater potential. In 1980, they went 6-10. In 1981, they went 13-3—the best record in
the league—and won the Superbowl. Another 17 years of quality performances
followed, including four more Superbowl wins.
While comparable progress is impossible in the BPL, the reasons for the
49er’s improvement apply to any sports team.
When competent people replace less competent people things usually get
better.
On the other hand, as poor a job as Joe Thomas did
for the 49ers, he was far more of an expert than I. That didn’t stop me from second guessing his
decisions—such as trading for an old O.J. Simpson with bad knees—but I was
better at second guessing things after they didn’t work out than before. The same is true with the current situation
at Southampton.
Most of the readers of this blog are far more
qualified that I to second guess—in football terms—what has happened this
summer. (I would maintain that I am
better qualified than most to talk about some legal issues, Financial Fair Play
issues, and, should they come up, evolutionary biology issues.) But few of you, if any, are more qualified
than Ronald Koeman or Les Reed to judge the quality and potential of football
players. Admittedly, many of you are
probably more qualified than Ralph Krueger to make such judgments but we are
told he is not involved in football decisions so that shouldn’t be an issue.
Thus, Adam Lallana may turn out to be an overpriced
slug who just had his career year or he may be the creative force in England’s
surprise Euro 2016 championship. Luke
Shaw might turn out to be better than Ashley Cole and start at left back for
England for the next decade plus or he might end up with numerous nagging
injuries playing behind Marcos Rojo for the next three years. We simply cannot reliably predict the future
and most of us lack the expertise to make reliable judgments on the likely
future.
This is not a call for unlimited trust in the board
or our team’s summer transfer dealings.
The outgoing traffic and rumors of additional outgoing traffic is and
was, I am told, unprecedented. This is
not a normal situation in which unbridled trust is an appropriate response. On the other hand, it is a situation which is
so unusual that it cannot reasonably be compared to anything that has happened
before. Is it really harder for a team
to gel with eight to ten new players than with three to five new players? Who knows?
It doesn’t happen often enough to judge—especially when the incoming new
players are purchased by a team with money and not cheap desperation signings
to fill holes. In other words, the only
reasonable response is to wait and see.
Confidence is not appropriate.
Neither is pessimism. Which
attitude you hold says more about you than what is actually happening.
Of course, this won’t stop me from trying to analyze
and evaluate what has happened. The
chance to do that with an audience of interested people is why I started the
blog. But I will try to do my analysis
based upon the most reliable and objective information that I, as an outside,
can obtain. When there are numbers to analyze
I will use them because I know what to do with numbers. When there are just subjective opinions and
feelings, I might use them to inspire an article, but unless the opinions can
be traced back to a source with some apparent level of knowledge and/or expertise,
I will not rely upon them.
Finally, I was going to do some sort of analysis of
our incoming and outgoing transfer activity thus far, but, after spending an
hour or two researching and writing it, I concluded that I had nothing
interesting to say--yet. I will wait for new
information.
I think you are right (and I enjoy your blog, so please keep writing). In his book "Staying Up" (which followed Coventry in 96/97, and which I recommend), Rick Gekoski reports that Gordon Strachan and his managerial team found the comments of fans about players and their contribution risible, such was their oversimplification, and their failure to understand tactics. I often think that the average fan sees relatively little of the game, the pundit a little more, but seasoned coaches and managers see more than either.
ReplyDelete